Paper Title
JUDICIAL DISCOURSES ON RAPE AND MARITAL RAPE: JURISPRUDENCE, CASE LAW, AND SYSTEMIC LOOPHOLES

Abstract
This is a research paper that critically looks at the judicial discourse concerning rape and marital rape, tracing the evolution of the latter in legal systems around the world and within specific jurisdictions. It explores the jurisprudential principles which govern judicial reasoning, interpretation of consent, and the differential treatment of marital rape and rape outside of marriage by law. The paper critically examines the inconsistencies and gaps in judicial reasoning and legislative frameworks by highlighting landmark judgments and statutory frameworks. Loopholes in addressing marital rape as a separate offense, societal and systemic barriers, and recommendations to enhance jurisprudence and bridge the gap between law and justice are discussed. This study is an attempt to contribute to the ongoing debates on the reformation of sexual violence laws, ensuring greater equity and justice. Keywords - Marital Rape, Jurisprudence ,Loopholes, Reformation